K
Konvertio.
Encoders & Decoders
Formatters & Linters
Generators
Converters
Text Tools
Blog
K
Konvertio.

Free developer tools — encoders, formatters, generators & more. No signup, no data processing on our servers.

Encoders

Base64 EncoderJWT DecoderAES EncryptHMAC GeneratorHash Generator

Formatters

JSON FormatterSQL FormatterXML FormatterCSS FormatterJSONPath Tester

Generators

Password GeneratorQR CodeToken GeneratorUUID GeneratorOTP Generator

Converters

JSON ↔ YAMLJSON → TypeScriptHTML → JSXDocker → ComposeSQL → MongoDB

Text Tools

Word CounterHTTP Status CodesPassword StrengthMath EvaluatorMIME Lookup

© 2026 Konvertio. All tools are free to use.

PrivacyAboutTermsBlog
HomeBlogUUID vs ULID: Which Identifier Should You Use?
April 5, 2026 3 min readUpdated Apr 9, 2026

UUID vs ULID: Which Identifier Should You Use?

uuiduliddatabasebackendidentifiers

image

The Problem With Sequential IDs

Auto-incrementing integer IDs (1, 2, 3) are simple but come with downsides: they're predictable, don't work across distributed systems, and expose internal scale. That's why most modern systems use opaque unique identifiers — typically UUID or ULID.

What Is a UUID?

A UUID (Universally Unique Identifier) is a 128-bit value standardized in RFC 4122. The most common version is UUID v4 — randomly generated:

f47ac10b-58cc-4372-a567-0e02b2c3d479
  • 36 characters (including hyphens)
  • 122 bits of randomness
  • Extremely low collision probability
  • Supported natively in PostgreSQL, MySQL 8+, and most languages

What Is a ULID?

A ULID (Universally Unique Lexicographically Sortable Identifier) was designed to fix UUID's biggest flaw: no ordering:

01ARZ3NDEKTSV4RRFFQ69G5FAV
  • 26 characters (Crockford Base32)
  • First 10 characters = timestamp (millisecond precision)
  • Last 16 characters = random component
  • Lexicographically sortable — newer ULIDs sort after older ones

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureUUID v4ULID
Length (string)36 chars26 chars
SortableNoYes (by time)
Contains timestampNoYes
Randomness122 bits80 bits
DB index performancePoor (random)Good (sequential-ish)
Native DB supportWideLimited

Why Sortability Matters for Databases

In B-tree indexes (PostgreSQL, MySQL), random UUIDs cause page splits — every new insert may land anywhere in the index, causing fragmentation. This becomes a serious performance issue at scale.

ULIDs, being time-prefixed, mostly insert at the end of the index — similar to an auto-increment ID.

UUID v7 — The New Standard

UUID v7 (RFC 9562, finalized 2024) combines the best of both worlds — it's a UUID with a timestamp prefix:

018e3a1d-e4d3-7000-a7c1-3b5f8d2e1a90
^time prefix^

It's sortable, recognized as a UUID, and has growing support. If you can use UUID v7, it may obsolete ULID for most use cases.

When to Use Each

Use UUID v4 when:

  • You need maximum compatibility with older databases and ORMs
  • The embedded timestamp would be a privacy concern

Use ULID when:

  • You need sortable IDs without a separate created_at index
  • Building distributed systems that generate IDs client-side

Use UUID v7 when:

  • Starting a greenfield project and can choose freely
  • You want a modern, standardized, sortable identifier

Generate UUIDs and ULIDs Instantly

Use the free UUID / ULID Generator on konvertio.app — generate single or bulk IDs in any version, copy to clipboard, and use them immediately.

Back to all posts
Share
Twitter / X LinkedIn Facebook
Tags
uuiduliddatabasebackendidentifiers
Resources
All ToolsJSON FormatterBase64 EncoderJWT DecoderUUID GeneratorAll Posts
Follow
Twitter / X LinkedIn RSS Feed Newsletter